<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Message Board - I had one on a 1917 Colt that I got cheap ...</title>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/</link>
<description>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Private Message Board</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>I had one on a 1917 Colt that I got cheap ... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, I bet that was a handy deal!  I have a Brazilian 1937 with a similar goose egg, but it’s duh closer to the frame, between the frame and the ejector rod lug so the current barrel isn’t useable. I picked up a British barrel for it that have fit to a decent barrel cylinder gap bit as of now t ha no throat. I need to cut some sort of bevel and try it out.  I w9dl love to cut it down to belly gun status and go from there but we’ll have to see how it does with a full length tube first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62142</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62142</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2023 23:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Slow Hand</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>DECADES AGO I THINK IT WAS NUMRICH (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not sure if this one is ‘professional’ or home brewed. It has a pretty skinny profile and a shoulder at  the frame intersection. It also has a barrel bad style front sight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62141</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62141</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2023 23:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Slow Hand</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>I had one on a 1917 Colt that I got cheap ... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>had a big egg about 4&quot; down the barrel where someone had stuck a bullet in the barrel and then shot it out the next shot.  I cut the barrel off to 3&quot; and used it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62126</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62126</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 14:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>JimT</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>DECADES AGO I THINK IT WAS NUMRICH (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OFFERED THOSE LONG BARRELS. HAD ONE ON A .45 COLT NS--I SHOULD HAVE KEPT IT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62124</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62124</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 13:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thanks, JT! (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, thank you Mr Taffin. I have had an interest in the 1878 Colt since buying a relic co Siri on one years ago at an auction. I haven’t jumped into buying a shootable or nearly shootable one, since I like projects. </p>
<p>I have been fortunate enough to own a few New Services and I really like them. I just sold a .38/40 that shot well, but nearly a foot low. I tried various loads and bullet weights and it still shot very low. I figured it had survived a century with the shark fin front sight still in tact and I wasn’t going to be the bad guy to file it down so I moved it down the road. </p>
<p>I have had a really rough .455 that was trimmed for .45 acp in moon clips and  .45 AR. I load it to close to original specs and it shoots surprisingly well with how horrible the bore is. </p>
<p>I also lucked into an affordable 1909 in .45 Colt that is a wonderful revolver to shoot. I’m honestly not sure if I like it or my .45 Colt mountain gun more!</p>
<p>Lastly I picked up a mush mash that looks like a 1917 frame but the cylinder is .45 Colt and the barrel<br />
Is from who k owns where and is around 8”!  It’s pretty loose and even though it shoots, it’s kind of a project. I have another.455 6-1/2” barrel here that I’m thinking of putting on the oddball long Tom and maybe even cutting it to 4”. </p>
<p>I have liked S&amp;W N frames for along time but they seem<br />
To beat up my hands. The colts don’t seem as abusive with the same level loads (6.0 red dot under a 454424)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62120</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62120</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 21:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Slow Hand</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thanks, JT! (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62116</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62116</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2023 04:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thanks, JT!</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed your article on the old Colt double actions.</p>
<p><a href="https://americanhandgunner.com/our-experts/the-sixgunner-three-old-colts/">https://americanhandgunner.com/our-experts/the-sixgunner-three-old-colts/</a></p>
<p>Really like the look of that 1878 model. Never have seen one in person, but definitely like the look in pictures. <img src="https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.png" alt=":-)" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62115</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=62115</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2023 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
