The Frontier Sixshooter Community Message Board - It isn't really that bad.

It isn't really that bad. (reply)

Hoot — Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:45:31 +0000

Of course, I do load my H&R's a bit on the heavy side so the difference isn't that great. I can bring an SP-101 in .327 to AR (assuming you make it) if'n you'd like to give it a go. Just holler.

From what I have heard about the 327 magnum being fairly (reply)

stonewalrus — Sat, 06 Jun 2020 02:17:26 +0000

Nasty to shoot I think I would rather have a 32 H&R

Mr. Taffin: Nice .32 H&R Article (reply)

SIXGUNNER — Sat, 23 May 2020 23:41:36 +0000

THANK YOU FOR THE KIND WORDS!

Mr. Taffin: Nice .32 H&R Article

Remington40x — Sat, 23 May 2020 17:18:33 +0000

Kudos to you for your recent Guns Magazine article on the .32 H&R. It's one of my favorite cartridges and it gets way too little attention these days.

The two Andy Horvath Rugers are lovely and the FA 97 with the second .32-20 cylinder makes me green with envy. You have great taste in revolvers, as you've demonstrated on numerous occasions in the past.

I've owned a number of firearms chambered for the .32 H&R, including the Ruger small frames in both standard and Bisley configuration, the Ruger SP101 4 inch, which is a fine kit gun, and a Browning Lo-wall I had rebored from .22 Hornet to .32 H&R. They've all been fun to play with and surprisingly accurate.

Anyway, thanks for the article and in particular the data.

Rem