<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Message Board - Newer S&amp;W K-Frames</title>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/</link>
<description>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Private Message Board</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Newer S&amp;W K-Frames (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It also depends on if the user wants single action or double action, and what ammunition they use.  The S&amp;W action design is such that the hammer is farther back in single action than double action and thus the double action hammer strike has less energy.  I've seen misfires with CCI primers.  I asked a gunsmith friend about it, a guy who used to build revolvers for PPC, and he said that my observations were common.  He said if a person was doing a lot of double action work they should use primers other than CCI.</p>
<p>Regarding hammer mass- I've noticed that something like a KelTec has what appears to be a very lightweight hammer and it seems to still work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55271</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55271</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Newer S&amp;W K-Frames (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cutting away metal means less mass.<br />
Less mass means less momentum<br />
Less momentum means less impact to the primer.<br />
I think some have found that they can remove too much hammer and have have caused faulty ignition.</p>
<p>I know on a Super Redhawk I had, I wanted a better trigger pull and opted for lower weight hammer spring.<br />
That worked fine all summer until colder weather.  First cold day on the range and I started having misfires.  I don't know what made me do it, but I replaced the &quot;weak&quot; Hammer spring and my ignition problems were solved.<br />
Hammer spring just too weak?<br />
Lube that stiffened just enough in cold weather?<br />
Some combo?<br />
Same result . . . Misfires</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55255</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55255</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2018 17:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>RidinLou</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Newer S&amp;W K-Frames (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There <em>can</em> be tradeoffs. Sometimes it's necessary to use a more sensitive primer, but for me that has usually been associated with using a lighter hammer spring as well. There are some guys out there that radically lighten the hammer, and those guns almost always require some tuning, but for a simple hammer spur bob you could very well be fine. If you go ahead and cut it, you might possible may want to consider one of the Wolff Extra-Power hammer springs if you feel ignition has been compromised. On the older guns it didn't seem to be a major issue, but I've seen some MIM hammers that appear to be partially skeletonized (lightened) from the factory, and that's why I'm sort of waffling a bit here. Extra length firing pins are also available for tuning purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55252</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55252</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2018 16:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>anachronism</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Newer S&amp;W K-Frames (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Removing the spur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55241</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55241</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 23:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Drago</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Newer S&amp;W K-Frames (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Define dehorn. Any metal removed from the hammer will reduce mass. All else being equal,, less mass = faster hammer speed = less lock time &amp; better ignition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55237</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55237</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 03:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ERSisk</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Newer S&amp;W K-Frames</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does de-horning the hammer on a current S&amp;W K-Frame create ignition problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55234</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=55234</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 09:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Drago</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
