<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Message Board - Arched - I never changed it from the way it came</title>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/</link>
<description>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Private Message Board</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Arched - I never changed it from the way it came (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to go look. Hadn't paid that much attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43305</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43305</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 14:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>stonewalrus</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Love my SR9E - feels great in my hand and it's like I (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you using the arched side of the backstrap or the flat side?</p>
<p>I had found in shooting my BIL's and nephew's.<br />
They have them set up differently, and I definitely shoot better groups, and no form induced POI issues either with the flat backstrap setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43281</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43281</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MS</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>I have liked the SR9 since I handled and shot them way back (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the list of attributes is pretty long.<br />
One other thing, adjustable sights. How many of it's competitors have adjustable sights? <br />
Some folks prefer fixed sights for this application, but adjustable sights work better for me. <br />
This sight appears to be well designed from the ruggedness aspect, we'll see if I can break it.</p>
<p>The real test though is reliability. How many rounds do you think a guy needs to put through it to be certain?<br />
3000? 10,000?<br />
How many failures in let's say 10,000 rounds is acceptable?<br />
I know my old Ruger Bull Barrel Target 5.5&quot; had 14,000+ and I never had a failure that wasn't out of spec ammo related. Bent cases, bullets lopsided that sort of thing.<br />
If it looked normal on non-magnified inspection and had powder and primer compound, it would cycle.</p>
<p>I sure would like to say that about this SR9.<br />
Time to cast up a few 1000 more 9mm bullets and limber up the Dillon 650.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43280</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43280</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MS</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>I have liked the SR9 since I handled and shot them way back (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey thanks for the heads up TL, I'll probably order a couple of packs of those for the dogs to give me for Christmas.</p>
<p>Six mags is a good start, but double that makes me more comfortable. </p>
<p>The dogs and I have a deal made, I get them what they want for Christmas, and they get me what I want for Christmas. Of course they can't shop, so I do the shopping for them.</p>
<p><br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43279</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43279</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MS</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>For a better deal on SR9 mags... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob - for a better deal on SR9 mags, Ruger sells a twin-pack, factory #90449.  Hope this helps....TL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43274</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43274</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TL in OR</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>I am thinking my SR9 may well be my &quot;church&quot; gun (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming I don't pull a Rob and carry multiples...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43265</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43265</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 01:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>stonewalrus</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Love my SR9E - feels great in my hand and it's like I (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can't miss with it. Definitely a slimmer double stack than most. At the NRA convention I played touchy feely with a wide variety of wondernines and the SR9 hands down felt the best to me. Reasonably concealable too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43264</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43264</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 01:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>stonewalrus</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>I have liked the SR9 since I handled and shot them way back (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in 07 or 08 when they came out. They feel more like a JMB design than a modern vying for the HI-Point Look a like contest Euro Guns...<br />
 I just picked up a brand new 9E to put in the safe. Ruger's spare mags are outrageous... but the gun is fairly slim and the trigger is great.<br />
 Frankly I am surprised that they are not more popular... SIGS 250/320 are a third again a s fat, better trigger than any Glurk,  more affordable than a S&amp;W...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43255</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43255</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rob Leahy</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>New favorite WonderNine</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I picked up a LNIB Ruger SR9 w/ stainless slide for less than 3 bills and my Christmas bonus check from the pharmacy covered that nicely.<br />
Score! <img src="https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.png" alt=":-D" /> </p>
<p>Honestly, this is the first double stack 9mm that feels like my all time favorite, the Browning High Power.</p>
<p>I'm thinking I like this better than the High Power in fact (It pains me to say it).<br />
Granted, I haven't handled a High Power in a number of years, but that snug high, tight feeling from that relief(?) in the backstrap up high that shortens the reach to the trigger ie. High Power, CZ-75, and now the SR9, they just fit me perfectly.</p>
<p>There is none of the stretch to reach the trigger or the &quot;slide the gun toward the thumb side of the hand&quot; to get to the trigger. This puts the gun out of alignment with the arm bones.<br />
Not so on the SR9, this and 17 round capacity? Sign me up!</p>
<p>In case anyone is wondering, I'm very familiar with the SR9, having run nearly 600 rounds through a couple that my BIL and nephew own.</p>
<p>That exposure led me to a search for a good deal on one.<br />
I believe I did well on this one, and the gentleman I bought it from, was happy.</p>
<p>There are two things that need attention, this is the safety model, and the rear edges of those small safety &quot;buttons will catch your skin if you let the slide down instead of releasing it at rear.<br />
I'll post a pic showing that, and what I'm thinking is the fix.<br />
The other is the trigger blade itself.<br />
Square Dude! A careful 20-30 minutes with abrasives and I'll be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43251</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=43251</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MS</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
