<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Message Board - I went back and forth on that for a while.</title>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/</link>
<description>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Private Message Board</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>I went back and forth on that for a while. (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a .32-20 S&amp;W as well as a Marlin rifle. No I don't NEED the cartridge but it will reload in the .32 H&amp;R dies and they do use the same bullets.  I like playing with new stuff.  I guess that is reason enough any more.  Soon enough I won't be able to do that and I might as well while I can, as long as I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39150</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39150</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Hobie</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>I had to get the .327 to make my Single-____ series (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hobie:</p>
<p>I've ignored the .327 because I already have both the .22 and the .32 H&amp;R Single Six Bisley versions of the Ruger (along with a 4-inch SP101 in .32 H&amp;R as well) and an S&amp;W K-frame with a Wondersight and a Marlin 1894 in .32-20.  I can't see adding another .32 to the stable and there's nothing that the .327 will do that the .32-20 won't.</p>
<p>Not sure what the question was that the .327 answered and I have enough other lost causes (Remington 141 in .32 Remington, Martini Cadet in .225 Winchester, Martini Cadet in .25-20 several versions of the .219 Zipper and .218 Bee, and two older 10 gauge guns that have 2-7/8 inch chambers, just to name a few) that I don't need to be adding to the stable of firearms chambered for hard to get cartridges.</p>
<p>Rem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39137</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39137</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Remington40x</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>I had to get the .327 to make my Single-____ series (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>collection &quot;complete&quot; so far as I'm concerned.  I have a .22 and a .32 H&amp;R.  All three guns use the same holster.  <img src="https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.png" alt=";-)" />   I am wondering just what the .327 will offer over the .32 H&amp;R but am thinking it will be a more easily reloaded version of the .32-20 that will have a little more &quot;ooomph&quot; if that is what I want.  I really prefer to pack a .45 Colt or .44 Special.  They seem more flexible if you know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39132</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39132</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Hobie</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Range day (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you got out. I did too last Saturday.  I have been contemplating a 327 but the way my old NM Blackhawk shoots it would be hard to beat as far as accuracy, but the 327 sure would pack a lot better.  </p>
<p> After our muzzleloader shoot last Saturday I asked the range master if I could plink a few rounds of 357 magnum from my Blackhawk (1980 model).  He gave the ok and I asked if anyone wanted to place any bets. I was betting I could hit the 300 yard green gong (12 inches or so and diamond shaped).  Nobody took the bet. I knew I didn't have snowballs chance but it was nice and sunny with good contrast for the target with a dirt background and foreground.</p>
<p>My partner spotted for me and it took 4 shots to walk them in and hit it with the last two. A few couldn't believe it and thought it was amazing. I talked of Elmer and they said &quot;Elmer who?&quot; I decided to try it offhand with the next 6.  Two hits and 4 misses.  The misses would have had a ruffian dancing for sure. My load is 13.6 grains of 2400 under a 158 grain XTP and a magnum primer(all I had when I loaded these). Seems like it chrono's about 1200 fps.  Probably hit as hard as a 38 S&amp;W at that range. I should have dug them out to see.</p>
<p>This Blackhawk has always been extremely accurate.  I believe every thing is lined up perfect with this pre CNC gun.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39131</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39131</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 01:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Bob Hatfield</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Range day... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raining &amp; overcast here also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39129</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39129</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Creeker</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Range day...</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FINALLY got to shoot both the adjustable sight Bearcat and the Single-Seven .327 at the range today.</p>
<p>98 rounds downrange of the Federal 85 gr. load with somewhat mixed results. The gun will apparently group but not from the bench today, oddly I did MUCH better both for grouping AND for proper placement (horizontal and vertical) from standing! My eyes are not up to 50-yard sight target alignment, at least in today's light (overcast and some light rain) and groups ran from about 6&quot; to about 2 feet (the later from the bench and those way to the left of the target in as much as one could determine the group center). I tried busting clay target parts on the berm but couldn't quite get the range and missed them all. One thing I noticed was the gun was rough, sometimes really dragging as the cylinder turned and the ammo seemed &quot;uneven&quot; as in chambering it seemed as if there were tight spots in the chambers or fat spots on the brass. After the 98-rounds there was NO turn ring.</p>
<p>The Bearcat suffered through some old Russian steel-cased Junior &quot;target&quot; ammo and did some better with Federal American. The steel cases ejected with effort but the brass cases slid out slick as snot. I did about as well on the clay pigeons on the berm with the little (should I say &quot;tiny&quot;) Bearcat as with the Single-Seven actually hitting a piece or two from 50-yards. 50-rounds of each was fired and the old Junior ammo was obviously suffering from age.</p>
<p>All in all a fun time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39128</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=39128</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 23:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Hobie</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
