<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Message Board - That's the same mould I have...</title>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/</link>
<description>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Private Message Board</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>That's the same mould I have... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These bullets are from Penn Bullets I bought during the buying craze a few months ago because I couldn't get my hands on a Lee mould. I had the TL version but wanted the traditional lube groove. Got it now and as soon as the weather cools a bit more I'm gonna cast a few hundred:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23526</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23526</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 04:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>1911 230 cast TC advice needed... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shoot the TC design 90% of the time in my 45 ACP's.  I have settled on 1.185&quot; OAL so the load will function in various 45's of 1911, XDM, PD, etc.  Some will take a longer OAL but accross the board 1.185&quot; works for me.  That is with the Lee TC conventional lube TC bullet and my old NEI TC design.  I use 231 and WST in my loads established many years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23497</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23497</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 19:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Cherokee</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>1911 230 cast TC advice needed... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had very good luck with 230 cast TC bullets in my 1911s. As always I seat the bullet down a smidge at a time, until the head of the case is flush with the barrel hood. I have no idea what that length is as I have never measured it. You do remove the barrel for this little job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23489</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23489</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>I forgot about that... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article is where I originally came up with the 1.220&quot; depth. I had to go all the way to 1.2&quot; with my Sig and it would only chamber a few before those started to hang up. That was a great gun with jacketed loads but was a pain with cast and the latter is all I really want to shoot in a .45. I probably won't get to shoot these until first weekend in Oct:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23470</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23470</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 04:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>The problem with these truncated cone bullets... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is they will engage the rifling when seated to the length of a ball round...sorta like a forward driving band on a semi-wadcutter. I think my books show them fired in revolvers and that's why they can get away with 1.275&quot;. I'm going to look into that tomorrow after the wedding and see if my suspicions are correct. I'm gonna need a lot to look into!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23469</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23469</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 04:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>This might be helpful... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thesixgunjournal.net/missouri-bullets-225-grain-flathead-for-the-45-auto/">http://www.thesixgunjournal.net/missouri-bullets-225-grain-flathead-for-the-45-auto/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23463</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23463</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 01:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sarge</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>1911 230 cast TC advice needed... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a factory UMC ball round to set my seating stem (or I say I did,.......many years ago and I have not changed it.  So I don't know how long the round is, but it feeds in everything.  6.5 gr of Unique is my load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23452</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23452</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 23:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>the Alsatian</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>1911 230 cast TC advice needed...</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my Glock I had to seat these 230 TC bullets to 1.200&quot;. A lot of my book data is for 1.275 (which may or may not feed) and 1.2&quot;. I'm curious if there is a generally preferred length for 230 TC bullets in the 1911. I'm starting with 1.225&quot; because it feeds easily and 5.7 grains Unique. If you have a preferred powder charge with Unique for your seating depth that would be cool too. I'm mostly looking more for a range/target/plinking load here. Thanks in advance, </p>
<p>rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23442</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=23442</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 19:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
